The easiest mistake in creative prompting is to say “be more creative.” The phrase is broad, but it has no working conditions. The model may produce plausible variation, but it is hard to explain why one variation is better than another.
I prefer choosing a lens first. A lens is a device for seeing the same topic from a different angle. With a lens, a prompt becomes less like a vague request and more like an experiment.
These twelve lenses combine what I saw in the creative writing portion of the prompt catalog with the PCHL frame.
Twelve Lenses
| Lens | Question | Works well for |
|---|---|---|
| Observer | Who is seeing this? | Viewpoint shifts, scene writing |
| Time | From when is this seen? | Reflection, prediction, history |
| Prohibition | What cannot be said? | Tension, censorship, secrecy |
| Lack | What is missing? | Desire, conflict, product ideas |
| Misunderstanding | What is believed incorrectly? | Twists, character, education |
| Materiality | What object reveals it? | Imagery, metaphor, branding |
| Scale | What changes when zooming in or out? | Systems thinking, worldbuilding |
| Genre | What grammar frames it? | Writing, content transformation |
| Opposition | What if the opposite were true? | Critique, alternatives, strategy |
| Loop | What repeats? | Habits, learning, agents |
| Cost | What is lost? | Decision-making, ethics |
| Evidence | What remains? | Research, mystery, analysis |
One lens changes the prompt. Two or three lenses together can create a much stronger variation.
Twisting One Topic Twelve Ways
Let the topic be:
Topic: “A day in the life of someone working with AI”
Here is what happens when the twelve lenses are applied.
| Lens | Generated prompt |
|---|---|
| Observer | Write a 500-character scene of a person working with AI from the perspective of their keyboard. The keyboard can sense only fatigue and rhythm. |
| Time | Write a short museum-style explanation from 2035 describing how people worked with AI in 2026. |
| Prohibition | Write a diary entry by an employee who is forbidden to use the word “AI” while describing their work style. Use only indirect language. |
| Lack | Describe a team that has every tool it needs except judgment criteria. Show what stops moving. |
| Misunderstanding | Satirize someone who believes AI will reduce all work, then accidentally creates more review loops. |
| Materiality | Explain AI collaboration using only five objects on a desk. Each object must represent one work stage. |
| Scale | Explain how one prompt expands into team decisions, product direction, and customer experience across three scales. |
| Genre | Write a day of AI work as a detective case file. All clues must be logs and diffs. |
| Opposition | Argue paradoxically why a team that refuses to use AI becomes faster in the AI era. |
| Loop | Describe a day of generation, review, revision, deployment, and feedback as a circular road rather than a schedule. |
| Cost | Contrast one sense a person loses and one sense they gain in a day accelerated by AI. |
| Evidence | Infer what decisions a person made from only the file names, commit messages, and meeting notes left at the end of the day. |
The topic is the same, but the prompts produce different scenes because the lens changes.
Upgrading with PCHL
Lens prompts are starting points. To make them usable, we can assemble them with PCHL.
1 | Prompt: |
Now the prompt is no longer just a request for many ideas. It is a loop for generating, selecting, and expanding ideas.
A Creative Prompt Generator
This is the generator template I want to keep in the catalog.
1 | Topic: |
The goal is not to generate a random pile of prompts. It is to create comparable candidates from genuinely different angles.
Five Prompts Ready to Use
1 | 1. Reframe one product idea through the lenses of lack, cost, and evidence. Each version must end with three customer interview questions. |
Creativity is not a talent we outsource to the model. It is a search space we can design. Lenses open that space, and PCHL turns it into repeatable work.
댓글
GitHub 계정으로 의견을 남길 수 있습니다. 댓글은 GitHub Discussions에 저장됩니다.