Education news has to be read quickly.
But something has to happen before speed. The sources have to be separated. A ministry press release, an admissions-focused specialist outlet, a broadcast news flash, and a daily newspaper analysis do not carry the same weight, even when they all appear under the same label: education news.
Some stories touch a student’s school life. Some signal a university policy change. Some are still raw policy documents waiting to be interpreted. Breaking news is fast, but often light. Official material is heavier, but it can be slower to enter the conversation.
So collecting education news is not just link gathering. It is a way of deciding what to trust first, and what to verify again.
I turned that standard into a small tool.
What I Built
The dashboard groups 50 Korean education-related sources into four buckets.
| Group | Count | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Education specialist media | 15 | Tracks admissions, universities, teacher society, and reading education from inside the education field |
| Major daily education sections | 15 | Shows how education policy spreads into wider society |
| Broadcast and wire services | 10 | Catches breaking reports, video coverage, and wire-style summaries |
| Government and institutions | 10 | Preserves policy originals, press releases, statistics, and research institute notices |
Then it separates those 50 sources into two operating states.
| State | Count | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Verified RSS | 22 | Feeds that returned HTTP 200 and RSS/XML structure on June 30, 2026 |
| Official page | 28 | Sources where public RSS was not verified, or where the official page is the safer path |
The second table matters.
I did not pretend that every source had a usable RSS feed. Some sites do not expose one. Some return HTML where an RSS reader expects XML. Some treat browser access and automated access differently. If those differences are erased, the dashboard becomes cleaner, but the judgment becomes worse.
For education news, an honest status label matters more than a tidy list.
RSS Is a Fast Eye. Official Pages Are a Heavier Eye.
RSS is fast. Put an OPML file into Feedly or Inoreader, and several sources become visible in one place. When specialist education outlets flow into a reader, early signals around admissions, school policy, and field-level debate become easier to catch.
But RSS is not enough.
For the Ministry of Education, local education offices, KICE, KCUE, and the National Education Commission, the value is not only speed. It is source authority. If a controversy grows, the final place to return is often the official page, not the article that first made the issue visible.
That is why this is less a live RSS reader and more a source operating board.
Fast signals should be read quickly. Heavy claims should be checked heavily.
How I Plan to Use It
The workflow has three steps.
First, import the OPML file into a reader such as Feedly or Inoreader. It includes only the 22 feeds that were verified, so the initial bundle does not carry a long list of broken feeds.
Second, use the dashboard to filter the source map. Terms such as admissions, Ministry of Education, edtech, college entrance exam, or vocational education narrow the board to the sources worth opening. This is not the reading step. It is the routing step before reading.
Third, return to official sources for high-impact claims. Admission rules, exam schedules, and school guidance should not be judged from one specialist article or one broadcast segment alone. Use articles to catch the signal. Use government and institution pages to check the weight.
As an LLM Wiki, This Is a Source Node Bundle
This dashboard is not a list of writing prompts. It is a bundle of LLM Wiki source nodes.
Each source carries a name, category, reliability tier, RSS status, watch keywords, and notes. Selecting a source in the dashboard produces a copyable LLM Wiki card.
For example:
1 | id: moe-newsroom |
That card becomes a floor for later education-policy writing. It keeps the question alive: not only “what article did I see?” but “what kind of source was that article?”
The Weight of Reading Quickly
The phrase “read education news quickly” is risky.
Quick reading can become careless reading. The person who saw a story first can start to feel like the person who understood it best. When the information affects students, parents, and teachers, that mistake can do real harm.
So I do not want this dashboard to be only a speed tool.
It is also a pause tool. Does this source have RSS? If not, is it an official page? Am I reading a specialist outlet, a wire report, a government original, or an opinion piece? Is this fact, interpretation, or commentary?
The point of putting everything on one screen is not to flatten everything into one stream.
It is to keep the differences visible.
Next Version
This first version is static. GitHub Pages cannot reliably fetch external RSS feeds directly in the browser because of CORS and publisher-side blocking. So this version chooses the sturdier path.
It organizes the sources, verifies the feeds that can be verified, exports OPML, and leaves the rest as official links.
A later version could use a server or GitHub Actions to create scheduled RSS snapshots. Even then, the principle should stay the same. The first job is not to scrape more articles. It is to preserve the difference between source layers.
Education news has to be read quickly.
But a fast eye needs a handrail.
This dashboard is a small version of that handrail.
댓글
GitHub 계정으로 의견을 남길 수 있습니다. 댓글은 GitHub Discussions에 저장됩니다.